Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Jane Bond 007
Posted 17 July 2019 - 04:17 PM
1) In Skyfall (I think it was) Craigs Moneypenny appeared to be the new female super spy and I was so happy for it and I was like yes! yes! so much awesome and thank you. In part because **** yes, a female super spy equal and the other part being that the machismo that is Bond would never ever have her. And then they had her accidentally almost kill Bond.
2. OO7 is synonymous with James Bond. Yes, it is a designation however it should feel as awkward as giving a ship other than the Enterprise the designation of NCC-1701. As such, I feel like this is just asking for negative response just based on the association.
3. More important than 2, and in line with 1... it does also bug me that the new female super spy is being saddled with Bonds designation because it sorta but not really but maybe kinda I dunno feels like someone thought in order for this female spy to be important or accepted or marketable or whatever that she needed to have the mans name... essentially. Like why couldnt she just be another OO and one that doesnt die like they normally do and one (a female anyway) that Bond doesnt get to assert his dominance over through sex (as he does with all these female spies that have appeared in his franchise)... the latter can still occur of course, that being that she doesnt get bedded by Bond, but she would still be saddled with his baggage.
I hope that makes some sort of sense.
Anyway, yay! Female Super Spy! I do dig it.
Also discuss, dissect, or flame away, what have you. lol Like I said... I dunno.
Another Afterthought: Not that a female super spy cant bed whomever she pleases, its just that in the Bond films Bond asserts his dominance through sex. So while there could be a sexual game like was she dominating or was he or was it equal mutual etc... wouldnt it also just be I guess you know the same old thing of Bond bedding the female supporting character. A rose is a rose is a rose.
Posted 17 July 2019 - 05:26 PM
I straight up admitted I've found the last round MI movies superior to Bond ones.
- NumberSix and zambingo +1 this
Posted 17 July 2019 - 10:01 PM
I've never been a big fan so I won't see the new ones. Of course I haven't seen any since Casino Royale. So take that as you will. Question is who are they marketing this movie to?
- zambingo +1 this
Posted 17 July 2019 - 11:02 PM
I looked at Box Office Mojo...
Maybe the adjusted for inflation is the only way to possibly grasp how pervasive the audience/sales were. Almost all of the films dont even have an estimated production budget though. lol It really is a wonder. I dunno.
Posted 18 July 2019 - 12:45 AM
Posted 18 July 2019 - 04:12 AM
Is this definite? Last year Barbara Broccoli flat out said it would never happen. Admittedly been heavily distracted with work but would of thought Internet fanboys would of had a melt down on this. . .though maybe I've just fortunately missed it all.
Golden Eye is a f****** solid Bond film. One of my favs. Honestly, every Bond is good in their era. But Bond IS the Connery/Lazenb/Moore era to me.
Yeah, Goldeneye for me is what would put the Brosnan era above Craig's. But counter to that, Die Another Day is why I'd put his era at the bottom of the barrel. . .
But both Brosnan and Craig really benefited from Martin Campbell kick starting their Bond movies. Casino Royale is up there with Goldeneye.
Part of it though I think depends on the actor portraying Bond while you were growing up. Brosnan ones will always have a soft spot for me as they were the ones I first saw and were coming out when I was in high school.
- Kyrian +1 this
Posted 18 July 2019 - 08:50 AM
I’ve been wracking my brain on Met’s question though— who exactly are the Bond films for? I’m guessing a very wide and general male audience, with some nostalgia seekers mixed in. That tells me a female lead isn’t going to give them the numbers they want, and let’s face it, between Marvel, Star Wars, MI, and pretty much any other wide action release, that demo is well served. So maybe they WANT to tap into a bigger female audience?
All I know is, having Pheobe Waller Bridge involved has my ticket sold already.
- Kyrian +1 this