Jump to content

Democratic Presidential Campaigns for 2020


Ms. Spam
 Share

Recommended Posts

I am okay with that!

There are things you shouldn't apologize for. You should never apologize for the things that are out of your control. He had no control over his race or whether he was male or female. If a female candidate isn't getting press it isn't because they are female, it's because they are uninteresting candidates. The press would love to jump on the Kamala Harris bandwagon. Problem is that she has no personality. Beto is showing he might be out of his League.

 

And Elizabeth Warren not wanting to do a town hall on Fox News isn't about Fox being "a hate for profit network". It's about her not wanting to answer opposing questions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, it's virtue signaling because her base hates Fox as much as they do Trump. Has nothing to do with questions at all. She doesn't even need to go that far.

 

It's also gotten more attention than anything else she's done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Two guys who don't stand a snowball's chance in Hell of winning as the top name on the ticket in 2020.

 

More reasons why O' Rourke is hollow:

 

Blank Slate

 

The excuse that:

 

"He is a blank slate that is waiting to be filled by our hopes and dreams for the United States," the woman said, introducing O’Rourke to the crowd."

 

...is not a compliment. It reinforces the belief that O'Rourke is not abut anything, has no ideas or convictions of his own. He's merely a puppet waiting for someone to write an idea on a piece of paper and slide it under his head cap. That is not going to appeal to anyone looking for someone who has a real sense of their issues and can get down to discussing real solutions--or anyone not drinking that DNC/entertainment business Flavor Aid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Watched a little. The crowd doesn't care about anything except abortion. They could literally just say "Abortion yay!" and win the debate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was fun watching them argue about how their Medicare For All is drastically different than anyone else's identical plan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How not to answer a question.....

 

"Senator Warren, do you have a plan to deal with Mitch McConnell if he is still Senate Majority Leader?

 

Yes(big applause)

 

Yadda yadda yadda win back the Senate"

 

A nice follow up would have been "Senator Warren, if Mitch McConnell it's still Senate Leader when you're elected then your haven't won back the Senate. So you plan is WHAT again?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That would work if debates actually were supposed to be meaningful. It's a low budget Adam Sandler movie minus Adam Sandler, and that goes for all presidential debates.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Watched a little. The crowd doesn't care about anything except abortion. They could literally just say "Abortion yay!" and win the debate.

No kidding. One would think its the issue of the century right up there with terrorism, homelessness and illegal immigration.

 

The short of it all, this was truly a Not Ready for Prime-Time Players sideshow; Warren typically promised things that she will never be able to pull off, and De Blasio was there for what reason? Someone should ask him about his record, just to watch him stutter. Then, there was know-nothing O'Rourke, who continued to prove he...knows nothing, especially when he seemed to be the "y--yeah, me too!" person to the ideas of others.

 

Oh, then there's the gun issue. Democrats really need to learn from the past--meaning if they ever think they're going to seriously curb or halt gun manufacturing/sales, just ask Obama, Clinton, Carter and Ouija board Lyndon Johnson about even tip-toeing in that direction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.