Jump to content

Welcome to Nightly.Net
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Photo

Weaponizing hyperspace


58 replies to this topic

#51
Darth Krawlie

Darth Krawlie

    privileged ****lord

  • Moderators
  • 34,638 posts
****in nerds
  • Good God a Bear and Odine +1 this

#52
Ryn

Ryn

    Moonshadow

  • Moderators
  • 28,544 posts
Atomic Rockets, for being hard-science, in nearly every entry includes a mention of the subject being used as a weapon. There's also the "killer bus" from Rocketpunk Manifesto.

#53
El Chalupacabra

El Chalupacabra

    Member

  • Supporters
  • 8,857 posts

Atomic Rockets, for being hard-science, in nearly every entry includes a mention of the subject being used as a weapon. There's also the "killer bus" from Rocketpunk Manifesto.

Interesting articles. Makes sense that if you are civilization capable of interplanetary travel, you would build interplanetary equivalents of ICBMs (IPBMs?) and the space-faring version of a fire ship.  



#54
Brett

Brett

    ...

  • Member
  • 1,979 posts

I dunno, I felt the same way I did when missiles were introduced in AOTC. I just thought, where did this come from? And where did they go? I understand Y-Wings dropped ion "bombs" and Luke used a "torpedo" or whatever to shoot the exhaust port, but it just makes the "rules" of the universe feel less cohesive. Laura Dern using her ship as a weapon kind of felt like the crap cherry on top a storyline that felt too Battlestar Galactica-y to begin with. Sure, it makes for a visually stunning moment, but it begs a lot of questions... in contrast to Rogue One where ships were used as battering rams. That to me was more tangible, narrative-ly exciting and believable. 


  • Filthy Jawa and El Chalupacabra +1 this

#55
RamonAtila

RamonAtila

    Member

  • Members
  • 885 posts

I agree, it's nice to have variety in attack styles from episode to episode, visually speaking. But if you want to live in the universe and make it make sense, you gotta ask yourself the question of why some things only make an appearance once then go away, or why technology in the films seem to evolve backwards.



#56
The Choc

The Choc

    Member

  • Member
  • 9,003 posts

I just really can't wrap my mind around stuff like this. At some point you have to accept that the movies are told out of order over the course of what is rapidly approaching a half century. Should they essentially just put a seal on ideas that were thought of in 77 or 80 or 83? That would be awful. 

 

It really goes back to the old "it just doesn't feel like Star Wars" vs "it's too much like Star Wars" stuff. Don't come out with anything new and its just a rehash, come up with something new and it doesn't fit with what's already established. The space between those 2 things are, for some people, completely non existent. 



#57
Filthy Jawa

Filthy Jawa

    Bring back Mandard!

  • Member
  • 8,678 posts
I think that's why these folks get paid the big bucks - to figure out that fine line.

#58
The Choc

The Choc

    Member

  • Member
  • 9,003 posts

No, if they are spending any time whatsoever worrying about that line they are completely misusing their time. 



#59
Filthy Jawa

Filthy Jawa

    Bring back Mandard!

  • Member
  • 8,678 posts
If Gareth Edwards spent time thinking about it, it shows and it was worth it.
  • El Chalupacabra +1 this



Reply to this topic