Poe Dameron Posted January 13, 2017 Share Posted January 13, 2017 I mean, what else could it possibly be? An animatronic Leia? Actors were dying tragically since long before CGI replacements were around. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mara Jade Skywalker Posted January 14, 2017 Share Posted January 14, 2017 http://www.starwars.com/news/a-statement-regarding-new-rumors They are not joking; they hardly ever comment on rumors like this. This is a big deal to them, obviously. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Driver Posted January 14, 2017 Share Posted January 14, 2017 "We want to assure our fans that Lucasfilm has no plans to digitally recreate Carrie Fishers performance as Princess or General Leia Organa." ....... again Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Darth Hunter Posted January 14, 2017 Share Posted January 14, 2017 - CGI- recasting- killing Leia off- writing her out of IX All options here.Option 1 or 3. I can't see anyone else play Leia and I would hate a main trilogy story where she's just "somewhere else" while things are happening with everyone else of the core characters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RamonAtila Posted January 14, 2017 Share Posted January 14, 2017 "We want to assure our fans that Lucasfilm has no plans to digitally recreate Carrie Fishers performance as Princess or General Leia Organa." ....... againThis.could be an insight into her role in VIII. Maybe she goes into.hiding? Maybe she leaves or gets killed and won't be needed in IX. I refuse to believe they'll recast because that IS THE BIGGEST MISTAKE THEY CAN EVER MAKE. This isnt Jennifer from Back to the future were.talking about here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mara Jade Skywalker Posted January 14, 2017 Share Posted January 14, 2017 I would say that what they did in Rogue One (in regards to Leia) is a big difference from creating an entire performance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
captainbleh Posted January 14, 2017 Share Posted January 14, 2017 I don't think recasting would be a mistake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poe Dameron Posted January 14, 2017 Share Posted January 14, 2017 I don't think recasting would be a mistake. If this had happened 4 or 5 years ago, I'd agree. Recasting the role between mid-20s Leia and mid-50s Leia wouldn't have been a controversial choice, or at least not controversial enough to override the relative simplicity of resolving the issue. But replacing her two movies in? Now you're treading into dangerous territory. The safest thing they can do is to use discarded footage and a body double to write her out either at the beginning of Episode IX or, if Leia was in significant danger near the end of VIII, change the ending so that whoever actually pulls the trigger. I'm pretty sure that there are many options on the table for how to handle that. Presumably, removing Leia from the movies is upsetting many plans, but if I were to wager, they'll quickly consolidate around giving Leia the sendoff she deserves and worry about the logistics of how to do it later. As far as the movie goes, replacing Leia in the plot is probably their bigger concern. Depending on how big a role Leia was going to have, this could cause some fairly significant re-writes. Leia may well have been expected to complete the passing of the torch to Rey and her companions. The confrontation and/or reunion between mother and son probably will never happen. For all we know, that scene could have been planned as key to the conclusion of Kylo Ren's arc. It's weird to think we could well have all the Big 3 from the original cast killed off 11 months from now, only two movies in. Being a wise old teacher is just about the deadliest job ever invented according to fiction (and especially in Star Wars), so there's a fairly good chance Luke doesn't make it out of Episode VIII alive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poe Dameron Posted January 14, 2017 Share Posted January 14, 2017 Perhaps this can be used from a story perspective? My prediction for Kylo Ren is that he is seduced by the Light Side. That he has a chance to repeat his performance with Han, but fails to kill Rey or Leia at the end and then goes into hiding until he reemerges in Episode IX somewhere between Ben Solo and Kylo Ren and denying both identities. His final redemption makes up a large part of the climax. Well, what if things are jiggered a bit so that after he makes his decision, something happens through Snoke or General Hux to kill off Leia and make Kylo Ren believe that he'd caused it? Give him a bit more in the "Oh my God!" thought, but also fuel the idea that he's gone this far to the Dark Side, maybe it's too late to go back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pavonis Posted January 14, 2017 Share Posted January 14, 2017 "Seduced by the Light Side"? Ugh. Please no. I thought Kylo was the villain not an emo goth geek. CGI actor resurrection is perfectly ethical, as long as they weren't killed just to justify resurrecting them. Fretting about it is silly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest El Chalupacabra Posted January 14, 2017 Share Posted January 14, 2017 Perhaps this can be used from a story perspective? My prediction for Kylo Ren is that he is seduced by the Light Side. That he has a chance to repeat his performance with Han, but fails to kill Rey or Leia at the end and then goes into hiding until he reemerges in Episode IX somewhere between Ben Solo and Kylo Ren and denying both identities. His final redemption makes up a large part of the climax. Well, what if things are jiggered a bit so that after he makes his decision, something happens through Snoke or General Hux to kill off Leia and make Kylo Ren believe that he'd caused it? Give him a bit more in the "Oh my God!" thought, but also fuel the idea that he's gone this far to the Dark Side, maybe it's too late to go back.I think the opposite. I think Kylo is going to go full-on evil, kill Snoke after he learns all he can, and be the new "Emperor" of sorts. Killing Han was supposed to show he crossed the line, and is irredeemable, and his story is the exact inverse of Luke's story, and different from even Vader, because even he was redeemed in the end. We've seen the Hero's journey with Luke (and maybe with Rey, if she is a Skywalker), a tragic hero gone villain who gets redeemed in the end with Anakin, but we've yet to see the Villain's Journey in a Skywalker/Solo in the movies, which is what I think Kylo's story is going to be. I wouldn't put it past Kylo to kill Leia and/or Luke. I think if Kylo is redeemed, that would be anti-climatic, and as sad as what happened to Carrie Fisher, from a story stand point, it would actually solve the question of what to do with Leia, as well as establish Kylo as completely evil and dark. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Krawlie Posted January 14, 2017 Share Posted January 14, 2017 YES. Please no redemption for Kylo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Driver Posted January 14, 2017 Share Posted January 14, 2017 They have time to fix IX and write around it. We may always wonder what could have been, and some day the original version of the script could leak-- but movies go through so many drafts before they reach the public. Even though I think it hindered them greatly, the PT movies were being written on the fly during shooting for many scenes. TFA did a major rewrite in the middle of production. The fact that VIII is still in post and IX is in preproduction means that they can find a way to write around Carrie's death. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Darth Hunter Posted January 14, 2017 Share Posted January 14, 2017 As for the question of ethics, I look at it this way. The Beatles were willing to put out new songs by mixing new material with Lennon's old unreleased tracks with the blessing of Yoko Ono, and (mostly) everyone was just fine with that. Having CGI Carrie mixed in with unused footage would be similar as long as the family also gives their blessing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Good God a Bear Posted January 15, 2017 Share Posted January 15, 2017 I don't know what's wrong but for some reason, Carrie's death has deflated all excitement I had for VIII and IX. I can't explain why. It's not like she had a huge role in VII. But I just feel so meh now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mara Jade Skywalker Posted January 15, 2017 Share Posted January 15, 2017 I felt that way at first. I still do at times. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Maker Posted January 15, 2017 Share Posted January 15, 2017 YES. Please no redemption for Kylo.He killed Han. There IS NO redemption for him. Okay I still have feelings about this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RamonAtila Posted January 15, 2017 Share Posted January 15, 2017 I can't get over this announcement from Lucasfilm. Why was everyone cool.with a hologram of Tupac but not CGI Leia? Too soon or.double standard? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark Wader Posted January 15, 2017 Share Posted January 15, 2017 Even though I think it hindered them greatly, the PT movies were being written on the fly during shooting for many scenes. TFA did a major rewrite in the middle of production. The fact that VIII is still in post and IX is in preproduction means that they can find a way to write around Carrie's death. Yeah, I've been reading a Lucas biography recently and according to that, Lucas hadn't made a definitive choice whether to keep or kill off Obi Wan until well into the shoot of ANH. They've got plenty of time to write around it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark Wader Posted January 15, 2017 Share Posted January 15, 2017 I can't get over this announcement from Lucasfilm. Why was everyone cool.with a hologram of Tupac but not CGI Leia? Too soon or.double standard?I actually had that very same discussion with someone recently, though it was before Carrie had passed and was related more to Cushing. The Tupac hologram there was no question he was no longer with us. It was there to serve as a tribute to the artist. A CGI likeness isn't a tribute, it's there to serve the franchise. For me, recreating Carrie's likeness in CG isn't done to pay respects to her, it's a workaround to help further Star Wars in narrative and financially. The hologram is just to act as a reminder of the talent we lost. That said, there were a lot of people who weren't cool with the hologram either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Driver Posted January 15, 2017 Share Posted January 15, 2017 I hate that sort of comparison. I see it in political posts all the time. Just because they are similar conceptually they may not be equally comparable. To say something general like "cool with Tupac but not Leia" implies they are being presented by the same people, to the same audience, by the same perpetuators. Lucasfilm didn't bring Tupac back to life for Coachella. The Coachella governing board and Death Row didn't pay a jillion dollars to recreate a Star Wars character. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Darth Hunter Posted January 15, 2017 Share Posted January 15, 2017 And to say that a CGI Fisher is there for financial gain but Tupac was there as a tribute is also off. It's not like they set up a free Tupac hologram concert at a public park for all to see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DANA-kin Skywalker Posted January 15, 2017 Share Posted January 15, 2017 Looking at everyone's opinions here, it seems that everyone feels okay with CG resurrection so long as certain requirements are met (for example intent). Since opinions differ on the requirements (outside forces) and not the actual act itself, I think it's safe to say the collective opinion here is that the act itself is not immoral. I think that's an important distinction to make. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RamonAtila Posted January 15, 2017 Share Posted January 15, 2017 Yea that's what I.was thinking too. Coachella isn't free. And I never heard a single complaint about Cushing in R1. My theory is that it's too soon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark Wader Posted January 15, 2017 Share Posted January 15, 2017 And to say that a CGI Fisher is there for financial gain but Tupac was there as a tribute is also off. It's not like they set up a free Tupac hologram concert at a public park for all to see.Not really. Sure they made coin off it, but its nowhere near the same as featuring a CG replacement in a multi billion dollar franchise to help sell some more tickets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts