RamonAtila Posted January 28, 2016 Share Posted January 28, 2016 I've just concluded that black holes aren't really holes. A hole is empty space. But you're already in space. How can you have an empty nothing derived from another empty nothing! It DOESNT make sense, right? RIGHT? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 28, 2016 Share Posted January 28, 2016 How can they be black if there's no sound in space? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pavonis Posted January 28, 2016 Share Posted January 28, 2016 Well, you're not wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brett Posted January 28, 2016 Share Posted January 28, 2016 Woody Allen: "black holes, *cough* let me tell you about my mother in law" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Krawlie Posted January 28, 2016 Share Posted January 28, 2016 has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Odine Posted January 28, 2016 Share Posted January 28, 2016 has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?Ahhh.... Yes. ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tex Posted January 28, 2016 Share Posted January 28, 2016 It's like "How much more black can this hole be?" and the answer is "None. None more black." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Driver Posted January 28, 2016 Share Posted January 28, 2016 has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like? Welp, Jacob has stroked out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?Welp, Jacob has stroked out.Just until he finds out if he's shooting blanks. Can't afford another pregnancy! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Krawlie Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 I HAVE TO WAIT TIL MARCH TO RETEST Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marc DuQuesne Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 How much hole would a black hole suck if a black hole could suck hole? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DANA-kin Skywalker Posted February 17, 2016 Share Posted February 17, 2016 And don't forget there's dark matter, or the unknown nothing outside the universe at it expands (or is the dark matter pulling it?) So there's three kinds of nothings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ms. Spam Posted February 17, 2016 Share Posted February 17, 2016 It's like "How much more black can this hole be?" and the answer is "None. None more black."Beyonce black? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marc DuQuesne Posted February 19, 2016 Share Posted February 19, 2016 And don't forget there's dark matter, or the unknown nothing outside the universe at it expands (or is the dark matter pulling it?) So there's three kinds of nothings.You are thinking of dark energy, dark matter is the thing that keeps galaxies from flying apart. I personally think that "dark energy" and "dark matter" are both signs that physicists are missing something really important about gravity. Observations don't match predictions, so they invented a bunch of crap to account for it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pavonis Posted February 20, 2016 Share Posted February 20, 2016 When observations don't match predictions of course we invent a lot of crap. It's a proven method. That's how the neutrino was discovered. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest El Chalupacabra Posted February 20, 2016 Share Posted February 20, 2016 When observations don't match predictions of course we invent a lot of crap. It's a proven method. That's how the neutrino was discovered.And wasn't that how Eris was theorized before actually being discovered, as well? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marc DuQuesne Posted February 21, 2016 Share Posted February 21, 2016 When observations don't match predictions of course we invent a lot of crap. It's a proven method. That's how the neutrino was discovered.The nuetrino is different. They predicted specific characteristics about the particle they were looking for based on a well developed and tested theory. This is like Vulcan. They had to come up with some reason Mercury didn't act how it should so they made up a planet. Later they discovered that gravity simply didn't work how they thought it did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RamonAtila Posted February 21, 2016 Author Share Posted February 21, 2016 It always turns out things didn't work the way they thought it did. Also with the recent discovery of gravitational waves you think they get sucked into black hole like everything else or they pass around them? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pavonis Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 When observations don't match predictions of course we invent a lot of crap. It's a proven method. That's how the neutrino was discovered.The nuetrino is different. They predicted specific characteristics about the particle they were looking for based on a well developed and tested theory. This is like Vulcan. They had to come up with some reason Mercury didn't act how it should so they made up a planet. Later they discovered that gravity simply didn't work how they thought it did. Vulcan was a perfectly logical hypothesis based on prevailing theories and data. The neutrino was a saving throw for the law of conservation of energy. Dark matter is a label for something (or multiple somethings, perhaps) that are definitely gravitationally interacting with luminous matter in this universe. If you dislike the prevailing ideas in science, feel free to submit your own rather than just sh1tting on the current ones. It's more fun that way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marc DuQuesne Posted February 26, 2016 Share Posted February 26, 2016 I "submit" my own ideas all the time, around a fire pit over a beer with friends. I learned long ago that this is not the right kind of forum for that. It quickly turns into a bunch of D-bags trying to prove they are smarter than the other D-bags. I don't like being one of the D-bags. Also, skepticism isn't shi11ing on their ideas. Skepticism is a prerequisite for the scientific method. My only point was that I believe the solution to this problem will be more like General Relativity and less like Vulcan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts