Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
NFF-Rule Change Committee Discussion
Posted 17 March 2011 - 07:09 PM
Posted 17 March 2011 - 08:38 PM
Um, you're an owner, not a player.
And a ****ing stupid owner at that.
I'll admit I laughed out loud at this one.
Posted 17 March 2011 - 11:20 PM
I vote FAAB.
Posted 18 March 2011 - 12:58 AM
vehemently. If I wanted to join an auction league, I would have.
Posted 18 March 2011 - 06:13 AM
Posted 18 March 2011 - 09:18 AM
- Rock +1 this
Posted 23 March 2011 - 08:38 AM
An executive decision may be needed.
Posted 23 March 2011 - 09:32 AM
Posted 23 March 2011 - 10:29 AM
I think I'll just get Jar Jar to grant me emergency powers.
Posted 23 March 2011 - 10:32 AM
Posted 23 March 2011 - 10:56 AM
Ex and gt still need to vote and they are around, plus the Invisible Twins.
Invisible Twins Power ACTIVATE! <whoosh> "Where'd they go?"
Posted 23 March 2011 - 10:13 PM
Posted 23 March 2011 - 11:23 PM
I vote that transactions be determined by rock, paper, scissors.
If not that, then FAAB.
I'm against consoslation games period. I say that if you're out, you're out. Add some prestige the Uber Bowl.
I actually brought up the idea of wager play around here. So screw you guys AND YOUR MOTHERS.
Edited by Super Dragon, 23 March 2011 - 11:29 PM.
Posted 24 March 2011 - 02:15 AM
Posted 24 March 2011 - 08:47 AM
Edited by Darth Irish, 24 March 2011 - 09:44 AM.
Posted 24 March 2011 - 10:54 AM
Posted 25 March 2011 - 04:38 PM
Posted 26 March 2011 - 08:41 AM
Sorry guys, my desktop crashed and Nightly wasn't cooperating w/ my Droid.
Posted 26 March 2011 - 05:50 PM
So we have 5 for FAAB and 5 for waivers.
Posted 26 March 2011 - 08:19 PM
Or is that just for ousting Rock?
Posted 26 March 2011 - 11:07 PM
I'm against conso
slation games period. I say that if you're out, you're out.
Posted 27 March 2011 - 01:46 AM
Posted 27 March 2011 - 09:36 AM
With it 5-5, and FAAB being the more radical change, I will make the executive decision that we will go with a waiver priority system.
I will see what ESPN is capable of, and come back with options for the league.
Posted 27 March 2011 - 09:43 AM
Posted 15 January 2012 - 12:13 PM
So...should a player be able to maintain rookie keeper elligibility if the team who originally drafts them releases them due to injury and they are claimed or drafted by somebody else before they have a chance to play?
I think that just so long as the player has never played in an NFL game and has never been claimed as a rookie keeper, they should maintain elligibility. Not a huge deal, just a suggestion for these injury situations for the future.