Jump to content

SPORTS JEOPARDY


Primbud
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • 1 month later...

I'm thinking of adding a little extra flavour for Final jeopardies. It's kind of like a luxury tax. Here's an example:

 

Jza, Irish, and Wicket are playing.

 

SJ.

 

hmmm

 

At the end of the second round, Wicket leads with 20000, Jza is second with 9000, and Irish is third with 7000.

Wicket therefore has a runaway lead and cannot be caught unless he wagers wildly.

So here's the new rule I'm conjuring up - Wicket has to wager at least 2000. This way if the second place player wagers everything they had and gets the FJ clue correct, and the leader gets it wrong, we may have a tie.

The new rule'd read like this - if a player has a runaway lead, they must wager an amount that would make their endgame total be tied with the runner-up if the leader gets the fj clue wrong and the runner-up gets it right while wagering all they had.

 

What do ya'll think?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.